NRA Media is moving faster and more effectively in social media than in the past. Case in point is the meme embedded below that I saw on X this morning. It makes great use of the Sophie Cunningham finger pointing.
We’re keeping our eye on you, gun grabbers! pic.twitter.com/N6ymCmEKJB
— NRA (@NRA) June 30, 2026
Kudos to whomever at NRA Media created this meme. It is effective and it gets the point across in a humorous manner.
Chip Brownlee is in a tizzy over at The Trace because there have been over 3,300 challenges to gun laws post-Bruen. He says that like it is a bad thing – which, of course, it isn’t.
The Trace recently updated its database of post-Bruen challenges through May 2026, bringing the total to 3,327 rulings. The milestone underscores how thoroughly Bruen has reshaped federal gun litigation and fueled a surge in challenges to firearm restrictions across the country.
The truth of the matter is that most of these cases are criminal cases. While I might wish that they had all been civil cases challenging restrictions on Second Amendment rights, I cannot fault a criminal attorney from using everything at his or her disposal on behalf of a client.
Civil lawsuits have been fewer, but more consequential. Those cases — often brought by gun rights groups or individual plaintiffs — tend to seek broader rulings against gun restrictions as a whole, rather than relief for a single defendant. Civil challenges have also been more successful, with judges invalidating gun regulations in 78 out of 279 rulings, or 28 percent.
The outcomes in civil cases also show a sharp partisan divide. Republican-appointed judges ruled against gun regulations in 61 out of 137 rulings, or 45 percent. Democratic-appointed judges invalidated regulations in 14 out of 113 rulings, or 12 percent
I did find it interesting that in civil cases challenging gun laws that Democrat-appointed judges overturned laws or regulations only 12 percent of the time. It is really true that they treat the Second Amendment like a second-class right. If it had been abortion, deportation of illegal aliens, or a Trump Administration executive order, that number would have been well over 50%. That said, one of the worst offenders in treating the Second Amendment like a second-class rights is Reagan-appointed Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III of the 4th Circuit who, to my knowledge, has never rendered a positive ruling on the Second Amendment. He didn’t like Heller and his opinion in Bianchi was ridiculous.
There are still some AWB and magazine cases pending before the Supreme Court such as Duncan v. Bonta and Viramontes v. Cook County both of which were scheduled for conference this past week. I guess we will find out if they are accepted or denied soon.
We are in what Amazon calls their Prime Days. They are running sales on a number of items exclusively for those with Amazon Prime. However, this includes those who signup for a free 30-day free trial as well as those who sign up for an Amazon Prime for Young Adult (18-24) membership which includes a 6-month free trial. The latter might be ideal if you have a kid off to college or even the military.
To be clear, I am an Amazon affiliate and receive commissions on items you purchase.
My plan is that any commissions or bounties that I earn this year will be earmarked as donations for the Virginia militia clause lawsuit. It will eventually go to the Virginia Supreme Court and appellate litigation isn’t cheap.
The items below are some that I’ve either used in the field or travel or items that I discovered after cruising through the Amazon site which I think are both useful and well-priced.
For Travel
The background noise on planes is annoying. It is especially annoying on long flights. I found these Soundcore Anker Life Q20 noise canceling headphones invaluable. They allowed me to sleep while on a 16 hour flight to South Africa, I could listen to a podcast using Bluetooth, or I could watch a movie without disturbing my seatmates. The battery life is long enough that if I charge them before I leave the US, they will last through the flight to Johannesburg and back. There are more expensive headphones such as those from Bose or Sony but these have worked for me.
Two things I have bought to go with these are a hardshell case and the Avantree Relay Bluetooth dongle that plugs into the plane seatback. The dongle allows me to avoid have to use a cord connection. You can find more expensive cases but this one has worked well for me and is only about $8. I put one of those giveaway carabiners on it and clip it to my backpack or to the seat.
I see that Anker now makes noise canceling earbuds. I have not tried them but for under $30 they seem like a deal. They would be less obtrusive than the headphones. One interesting feature is they have AI powered instant foreign language translation. That is pretty cool. I wonder if Afrikaans is one of those languages.
I bought this 26″ Amazon Basics suitcase a year or so ago and it has survived a number of trips. When the majority of suitcases coming down the baggage carousel are black, an orange suitcase stands out. It has allowed me to find my suitcase rather quickly and then go. As the name says, Basics. It doesn’t have integrated TSA locks but for the price I can live with it.
We all travel with an assortment of electronics nowadays from our phones to our iPads to Kindles. Keeping track of all the cords, chargers, adaptors, etc. is a headache. I found this medium size organizer ideal. It allows me to carry all my cords, adaptors, chargers, and even a powerbank in one case. It is under $10 during Prime Days and is worth every penny.
And speaking of power banks, I have found this Dark Energy Poseidon Pro Indestructible Portable Charger just right. It has enough juice to keep my electronics alive, it is rugged, and it doesn’t weigh a ton. I have other power banks but they are like bricks. The Dark Energy Poseidon fits nicely in the case above.
For Shooting, Hunting, the Outdoors, and EDC
Can you ever have enough flashflights? This little OLight imini 2 flashlight for your keychain is ideal. I have an older version but this looks be easier to recharge.
If you want something just a bit larger and more powerful, this OLight I3T EOS 180 Lumens Dual-Output is ideal. It can even be clipped to your hat brim when you need to use both hands. I bought one a year or so ago and it is part of my EDC. It uses only one AAA battery. If you think about it, we have come so far in flashlights. I still remember my old red Eveready flashlight that took 2 D-cells and put out a dim light compared to even the keychain light above. I hear they are considered “retro” and sell for a good price on EBay.
The next item isn’t cheap but then again neither are hearing aids. I have this set of ISOtunes Sport Caliber BT in-the-ear electronic plugs. They allow amplified sound of your surroundings but have a 25 NRR. I have used them at the range and they work well. Just as importantly, they are comfortable. I have tried others that have cords like those from Axil but I can never work the controls easily. Short of having custom made electronic plugs, these are a very reasonable and workable alternative.
We all need another knife. Well, kinda. That said this Cold Steel SRK Compact is a good buy at around $26. It is over 50% off its MSRP. I always keep a knife or two in the car and at this price I think the Cold Steel SRK Compact would work well. As my younger daughter would say, the handle has “grippage”.
I intend to update this as I find more items of interest.
UPDATE: One of the things I caught on sale that I always use when traveling and especially in my rifle case are Apple AirTags. They work with your iPhone or iPad to let you know where your luggage or other items are located. They have a replaceable battery and will give you a low battery warning. On Prime Days, a 4-pack is $89 versus $24 for one which is normally $29.
An alternative to the Apple product that I’ve used are the Air Tracker tags. They are NOT an Apple product but will work with the Find My feature of the iPhone and iPad. I used three on my recent trip to South Africa. Two worked just fine while the third said my carry-on pack never left North Carolina. I think they are OK and the price for a 4-pack is equivalent to the price of one AirTag.
I am not an Android user but I understand this one from Samsung works well with Android phones. It is called the Galaxy SmartTag2. Travel & Leisure magazine rates it tops for Android phones to track your luggage.
One thing I did before all my trips to South Africa was to treat my pants and shirts with permethrin as a tick repellant. I must have done it correctly as I did not get any tick bites. African tick bite fever is no joke just like the North American versions of tick borne diseases. The Sawyer Permethrin spray is what I used. Just to be clear, it is for treating your clothing and not to be sprayed on your skin. Right now Amazon is offering a six-pack of 4.5 oz bottles for $19.99. That should be enough to treat your whole family’s clothing for a couple of trips.
UPDATE II: I wasn’t sure about the Magpul DAKA grid system until Roy Hill showed it to me at the SCI Convention. Not only does it lock your rifle into place with no slippage but it is easy to adjust if you want to use the case for another rifle. The DAKA grid system below is for the Pelican 1750. As I can attest, it also works just fine in the Harbor Freight Apache 9800. I just took that case with DAKA inserts to South Africa with no damage to my rifle or optics. You can find the Apache 9800 on sale quite often.
Speaking of Africa and safaris, what would they be without a sundowner? My sundowner of choice is, of course, the quintessential G&T. You can use grocery store brands if you wish but a premium tonic water like either FeverTree or Q makes it better. I just notice a case of FeverTree tonic water is on sale for the Prime Days. Q tonic water which uses agave for a sweetener is a great alternative and gives you a little bit more tonic per can.
The quote of the day comes from Justice Samuel Alito in his majority opinion in Wolford v. Lopez which invalidated the State of Hawaii’s “vampire rule.” That law said that carry was only permitted in private businesses where it was expressly and openly permitted as opposed to those that had posted against carry.
The Second Amendment cannot give way to “the spirit of Aloha” in Hawaii, contra, State v. Wilson, 154 Haw. 8, 27, 543 P. 3d 440, any more than it can yield to the spirit of the Big Apple (Bruen) or the Windy City (McDonald). Merely local attitudes can neither shrink nor inflate the meaning of fundamental Bill of Rights guarantees that apply to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment.
This is a win for the Second Amendment in more places than Hawaii. New York is one state that immediately comes to mind.
My congratulations to attorney Alan Beck on his first win in the Supreme Court.
You can read the whole decision here.
It was one of those days in a very good way.
I got invited to an AR build party at the end of July with Rob Pincus and David Yamane. Over the last few days I’ve been digging up the parts I’d accumulated over the years for a lightweight build. I found my Aero Precision stripped upper with a matching lower, I found my Doublestar ARFX skeleton stock, I found the CMC AR flat trigger, I found the Odin Works red anodized lower parts, and all the little KNS Precision pins and parts I’d won years ago.
What I was missing was the Faxon pencil barrel that I’d bought at a NRA Annual Meeting a few years ago plus the ALG Defense EMR-V3 13″ handguard. I thought these parts might be stored in one of three trunks where I have put extra pouches, ALICE and Molle gear, holsters, and a bunch of other stuff. I found the barrel almost right away in the topmost trunk. Then as I started looking in the second trunk I happened to look to the side and saw a box. I wondered what was in it and it was the ALG Defense handguards! All my parts needed to complete the lightweight AR had been found.
If the story stopped there, I’d still be a very happy camper. But as both Ron Popeil and Billy Mays would say, “But wait, there’s more!”
Years ago I had bought a surplus Aimpoint Comp M4 red dot sight. I had lost track of where I had stored it. A new AA battery and it works perfectly. I not only found it in trunk number one along with the Faxon barrel but I found my SOG PowerLock multi-tool.
In addition, I found my DSG Arms complete upper which I think has a Seekins Precision barrel on it. That upper was one of the first “tactical” uppers I bought as it had a full length handguard with Keymod slots. “Keymod” tells you how long ago I bought it! Digging through the trunks I found a sling bag that I plan to take with my on a trip next month as well as other stuff.
I have over the years taken advantage of Black Friday and other sales to buy parts and accessories at a discount. I try to keep up with where everything is stored but obviously I fail.
However, today was just one of those days when everything just came together. Given my luck today I wonder if I ought to buy a lottery ticket. The winnings could finance a lot of 2A lawsuits.
Judge William Glover of the Spotsylvania County Circuit Court denied the motion for a preliminary injunction this evening in Curtis v Katz. This was the case that challenged the new Virginia assault weapons ban and magazine restrictions on the grounds that it would prevent Virginia citizens from obtaining the weapons necessary to carry out their duties as part of the unorganized militia.
Judge Glover wrote that while the plaintiffs had established that they would suffer irreparable harm if the law goes into effect, he was not persuaded that the Virginia Constitution granted members of the unorganized militia the right to possess “military style weapons.” He went on to say that an injunction might cause harm to the Commonwealth as the duly-elected governor and legislature enacted the laws in the name of public safety. He went on to say, in not so many words, since the people had elected Spanberger and the anti-gun Democrats then it was in the public interest to let the laws go into operation.
There is a press conference tomorrow with former AG Ken Cuccinelli. I plan to attend by Zoom and will report on it later.
In the meantime, this ruling shows that elections have consequences. Every gun owner, every hunter, and every apathetic Virginian who couldn’t be bothered to vote in the 2025 elections bears partial responsibility for this outcome. Apathy has its own cruel rewards.
UPDATE: Soon after I posted this, I received Judge Glover’s full opinion which I am embedding below. The screenshot in the post was an abridged version. What I find interesting is just who submitted declarations in support of denying the injunction. You had Andrew McKevitt of Louisiana Tech whose book Gun Country we read in David Yamane’s book club as well as Prof. Robert Spitzer, a retired political scientist from SUNY Cortland, who makes a nice living in retirement as an “expert witness” promoting gun control.
Curtis v. Katz had a hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction yesterday in Spotsylvania County Circuit Court. From what I have read, the hearing continued for four hours and the judge will make a ruling sooner than later. Anecdotally, I heard from a friend that the judge thought the brief in this case was one of the more interesting ones he has read in all his years on the bench. I hope that is a positive sign.
The Second Amendment Foundation has announced that they will be supporting this case.
“While SAF is already a named plaintiff in our own federal Second Amendment challenge McDonald v. Katz, we felt it important to support this unique lawsuit,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “When it comes to vindicating the rights of our members, we will pursue every viable legal option. We are thrilled to have been given the opportunity to support this state court challenge with Mr. Cuccinelli and think it complements our ongoing federal challenge very nicely.”
As noted in the compliant, “The General Assembly cannot…prohibit the body of the people from acquiring the very weapons with which they must be prepared to serve as that militia.” Joining SAF in Curtis v. Katz are Bob’s Gun Store, Mike Wood, Dustin Curtis and Daniel Hinkson. Cuccinelli is the attorney of record for the lawsuit.
“We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again – Virginia lawmakers outright lied to their constituency when they said these new laws aren’t bans,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “As we’ve seen in the news lately, numerous county prosecutors across Virginia have publicly stated they will not enforce this new ‘assault weapons’ ban. When the people who enforce the laws are refusing do so it should be a wakeup call for lawmakers that they passed an unconstitutional law.”
This is good news and I understand there is an outreach to other organizations and foundations for support. The uniqueness of this case – it is based upon the state interference on the ability to perform responsibilities and not rights per se – that makes it one that is breaking new ground.
Bearing Arm’s Cam & Co. discussed this lawsuit with William Kirk of Washington Gun Law yesterday. The discussion on it starts at about the 12:30 mark in the video below.
Kirk called the strategy brilliant as well as refreshing as it wasn’t a copy of so many other arguments he’s seen over time.
As a reminder – actually a plea – donations are needed to support this lawsuit. It undoubtedly will end up at the Virginia Supreme Court and that costs money. You can help support this lawsuit by making a tax-deductible donation to Rights Watch International. Use the link below:
https://www.rightswatch.org/donate
As I learned myself in 2024 when I first started gathering signatures to be on the 2025 NRA ballot for the Board, it is better to start early. Once the Nominating Committee meets and issues its report, there only remain 45 days in which to get the required number of signatures and submit them. Importantly, that is a hard 45 days with no exceptions made for natural disasters, war, or other calamities.
Some of the candidates below may also get nominated by the Nominating Committee. Frankly, in my opinion, a dually nominated candidate is stronger and was the reason I chose to continue the petition process even after I was nominated by the Nominating Committee.
The candidates below include two sitting Board members, two who served limited terms replacing two who had resigned, and one candidate who has never served on the Board but brings lots of experience.
If you are a voting member of the NRA, you are eligible to sign these petitions. A voting member is a Life Member of whatever level or an Annual Member with five or more years of continuous, unbroken membership. The electronic petition process will kick you out if you are not eligible to sign the petition or at least that is my understanding.
Todd Vandermyde
Todd is serving a one-year term on the Board of Directors. Todd brings the experience of having fought in the trenches in a blue state for gun rights as well as serving as president of the largest gun club in Illinois. He asks the questions that others either don’t think of or are too timid to ask. He lives and breathes the Second Amendment and ways to advance it. Among the board committees Todd serves on are Legal Affairs and Legislative Policy. Having nominated Todd twice for the Board, I can say without reservation he has my full support and we need people like Todd on the Board.
Todd’s petition: https://nra.directnominations.net/Petitions/Sign/1aaf6d83-59ab-4359-8155-78ebc00caa63
Huey Laugesen
Huey was elected to a one-year term on the Board of Directors in April. He is the executive director of the Colorado Shooting Sports Association and has brought new life to that organization. Before being elected to the Board, Huey served with me on the Membership Committee and I thought he advanced effective ways to reinvigorate our membership recruiting efforts. I endorsed him in the 2026 election and would be proud to do it again. He is now also serving on the Legislative Policy Committee with me where he will be bringing, like Todd above, the experience of fighting for rights in a blue state. Huey may be the youngest director on the Board but far from the least experienced.
Huey’s petition: https://nra.directnominations.net/Petitions/Sign/1b5b06d4-d28c-415e-abeb-33da7fb00ccf
David Mitten
David was part of the ElectANewNRA team in 2025 and finished a runner-up. When former NRA President Bob Barr resigned, David took his place on the Board. He was not on the 2026 ballot but is running this time. He currently serves as a non-director member of three NRA committees – Collegiate, Education & Training, and Gun Collectors. David is a retired teacher from Ohio who, among other things, helped develop the curriculum for the Ohio Hunter Education program.
David’s petition: https://nra.directnominations.net/Petitions/Sign/761a1fe8-b495-489f-a92b-8870b45a8aa0
Mark Shuell
Mark was nominated for the Board in 2025 but finished a runner-up. He assumed a seat on the Board when Gene Roach resigned. Mark is a retired financial planner from Michigan who has been very active in grassroots activism in advancement of the 2nd Amendment. He won the 2023 NRA-ILA Jay M. Littlefield Volunteer of the Year award for his efforts. He currently serves on both the Action Shooting and Grassroots Outreach Committees as a non-director member. Mark in 2025 was one of those candidates left in“no man’s land”. Despite this, based upon multiple conversations with him, his heart lies with reform. He was endorsed in 2025 by Jeff Knox which probably didn’t endear him to the Old Guard.
Mark’s petition: https://nra.directnominations.net/Petitions/Sign/e420c4e0-dd37-4f91-84a3-5bb5bd39cf68
Chuck Cunningham
Chuck is currently the Director of State, Local, and International Affairs at the Veterans Administration. In years prior to that he served as a Senior VP for Government Affairs for the non-profit Securing America’s Future Energy among other such positions. Much more importantly, he worked for NRA-ILA for almost 17 years where he served alternately as Director of State and Local Affairs and as Director of Federal Affairs. To say he would be a valuable addition to the Board is an understatement. Finally, he is assisting in raising funds for the Virginia Militia Clause lawsuit which I recently wrote about.
Chuck’s petition: https://nra.directnominations.net/Petitions/Sign/0d00d119-aa6c-476e-9894-4617a1294855
Yesterday, June 13th, was World Gin Day. I only stumbled across later in the evening so I waited until today to post about it.
The UK is well known for its gin. Less well known but an up and comer is South Africa. They are especially getting known for their craft distilled gins. From my recent trip to South Africa, I brought these two home with me. This brings to seven the different gins I’ve brought home from there.
Bloedlemoen (pronounced ‘Blue’d Le Moon’) adds blood orange to the traditional juniper and other botanicals. It is distilled in Cape Town, South Africa. According to their website, it is the world’s first blood orange gin.
Six Dogs Blue comes from the Six Dogs Distillery. They are located on a farm in De Wet, Western Cape which is northwest of Cape Town. The blue color comes from the blue pea flower. When mixed with tonic water, your drink turns a light pink. Six Dogs makes a number of unique gins including Six Dogs Karoo which uses botanicals such as wild lavender and the Karoo thorn flower which they grow on their own farm.
To all the gin lovers out there, I wish them a happy but belated World Gin Day.
When a gun control law is challenged in the United States in either state or Federal court, the challenge is more often than not based upon the 2nd and 14th Amendments or the state’s equivalent protection for the right to keep and bear arms. A common secondary challenge might be based upon the the Administrative Procedures Act or the state equivalent.
In a state like Texas which lies within the 5th Circuit, this would be a winning argument. However, challenging the new Virginia assaults weapons ban and magazine restrictions using the right to keep and bear arms is more difficult because it lies within the 4th Circuit. The misguided judges of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals have held in cases like Bianchi v. Brown (2024) that the 2nd Amendment doesn’t apply to state level assault weapons bans. Virginia is already arguing in Crump v. Katz that their state’s constitution doesn’t protect an individual right to keep and bear arms. Indeed, a hearing on a preliminary injunction scheduled for today has been stayed by the Circuit Court of Lancaster County. I fear this will be the norm for all the cases brought in Virginia based upon the right to keep and bear arms.
However, what if the lawsuit challenging the new gun control laws was based not upon rights but on responsibilities as a member of the militia? Moreover, what if this challenge was solely on a state constitutional provision that could not be moved to a Federal court other than perhaps the US Supreme Court which probably would refuse to take it?
That is the whole premise behind Curtis et al v. Katz et al which is being tried in the Circuit Court of Spotsylvania County, Virginia. The argument is that the new laws violate the militia clause of the Virginia Constitution because these laws prohibit the acquisition of arms to which the plaintiffs must be trained a members of the militia. It challenges the law principally upon these grounds. The plaintiffs note that if the court should decide to not recognize the militia clause as an independent source of constitutional authority, historical precedent would hold that the new gun control laws could not survive scrutiny under the remainder of Article 1, Section 13, who guarantees a right to keep and bear arms. As the complaint states, “Under any analytical framework—whether the militia clause is treated as independently operative or as the definitional predicate for the individual right—the Act is unconstitutional because it prohibits the body of the people from acquiring the very arms that the militia clause identifies as constitutionally essential.”
The lawsuit is brought on behalf of two members of the Virginia unorganized militia – Dustin Curtis and Michael Wood, firearms dealer Bob’s Gun Shop, and certified firearms trainer Daniel Hinkson. Both Curtis and Wood are within the age parameters (Ages 16-55) of Va. Code § 44-1 which defines the unorganized militia. They are represented by former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, a Republican, who was the 46th Attorney General of Virginia.
Article 1, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution begins, “That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state.” These words were drafted by George Mason in 1776 prior to the Declaration of Independence and have remained a part of the Commonwealth’s Constitution ever since.
As the complaint notes:
They are not a preamble. They are not a recital. They are operative constitutional text, continuously in force for two hundred and fifty years.
The breadth of that guarantee is remarkable. Article I, Section 13 speaks of “the body of the people”—without qualification as to sex, age, or other condition. The Virginia Constitution thus embeds the militia concept at its most expansive: not a narrow demographic slice, but the people themselves, armed and trained for the defense of the free state. George Mason, who authored these words, confirmed their sweep on June 4, 1788, at the Virginia Ratifying Convention: “I ask, Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers.”
The complaint goes on to note that the firearms and magazines banned under the new Virginia gun control laws are the civilian equivalents of those used by the Armed Forces of the United States and the Virginia National Guard. In other words, they are the very firearms and magazines that militia members must obtain and be trained in if they are to fulfill their responsibilities as members of the militia.
The intellectual foundation for this lawsuit comes from the work of Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. His exhaustive research on state militias is found in The Sword and Sovereignty: The Constitutional Principles of “the Militia of the Several States”.
In every era, this has meant the weapons that bear a functional relationship to those issued to the organized military forces of the Commonwealth and the nation. As Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr. has documented, this is a fixed constitutional principle, not a matter of legislative grace: the arms suitable for militia service must be no less current and effective than those carried by the members of the regular armed forces.
This concept is reinforced in US v. Miller where the US Supreme Court said the 2nd Amendment protects weapons bearing “some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia” and those that are “part of ordinary military equipment” or “could contribute to the common defense.” While the US Supreme Court found that Jack Miller’s sawed-off shotgun didn’t qualify as a militia weapon, I think that court would have found AR-15s which share the majority of their parts along with the same cartridge as the M-16 bear that reasonable relationship.
The plaintiffs are asking for both a declaratory judgment that the law is unconstitutional and for permanent and preliminary injunctions to stay its enforcement. The hearing on the preliminary injunction is next Wedneday, June 17th. Interestingly enough, the Commonwealth’s Attorney for Spotsylvania County, G. Ryan Mehaffey, is fully in support of a preliminary injunction being issued and has asked the court to grant it.
Donations are needed to support this case. Rights Watch International, a North Carolina-based 501(c)3, is working with our fellow patriots in Virginia to help raise money for the litigation. All donations, whether $5 or $5,000, will be used to support this fight. Given this is for civil rights litigation and Rights Watch is a 501(c)3 organization, your donations are tax deductible. Thank you in advance for your generosity.
To donate, use this LINK.
There is a move to consolidate all the four state-level cases. It will remain to be seen whether Curtis will be exempted from this move to consolidate as it is arguing very different grounds to invalidate the new assault weapons ban and magazine ban.
You can read the whole complaint below:
by